The peer-reviewed proof — what Edinburgh Napier and Worcester Bosch actually found
This article has a rare advantage: the concept it describes is not theoretical. It has been trialled in a real home, measured with calibrated telemetry, and the results were published at the International Retrofit Conference 2025 at the University of Salford. The paper — "Sunamp Heat Battery as a Pre-heating Solution for Domestic Hot Water Heating: A Case Study Evaluation" — was co-authored by Edinburgh Napier University, Worcester Bosch, Okana Global, and Sunamp.
Configuration tested: Typical 4-bedroom retrofitted home · 2.5kW solar PV system · Sunamp Thermino heat battery used as a pre-heater for a gas combi boiler · telemetry monitoring by Okana Global
What the Sunamp does: Sits between the cold mains supply and the gas combi boiler. Solar electricity charges the Sunamp's PCM via its 2,800W immersion element. Cold mains water passes through the Sunamp's heat exchanger before entering the boiler, arriving pre-warmed. The boiler only tops up the remaining temperature rise needed.
Result: Yearly cost savings of approximately £91 and carbon emissions reduction of up to 86% during summer months when solar generation is available.
Researchers' conclusion: "The true performance potential is high, especially if installers follow best practices like better pipe insulation, optimised temperature settings, and optimal PV placement. The takeaway is clear: this is a scalable, viable solution for many homes." — Prof. Robert Hairstans, Edinburgh Napier University
Policy finding: Sunamp heat batteries are not recognised in the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) or the forthcoming Home Energy Model (HEM), and are excluded from ECO4 and the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund. The technology has been proven. The policy hasn't noticed.
The configuration tested is precisely what this article proposes scaling using curtailed wind energy: an electrically charged Sunamp pre-heater sitting in front of the gas boiler (or heat pump), fed by surplus renewable electricity via a diverter. In the study that electricity came from solar PV. In our proposal, it comes from Eddi Channel 2, absorbing curtailed Scottish wind that is currently being paid to not generate.
The 86% figure applies to summer months, when solar generation is consistently available. For our wasted wind application, the equivalent periods are high-wind events — which in Scotland are concentrated in autumn, winter and spring, and which correlate with the worst curtailment events. On a day like December 18, 2024, when Scotland's wind farms generated far more than the B6 boundary could carry south, every Sunamp on Eddi Channel 2 would be charging at maximum from free electricity. The emissions reduction during those events would approach the same 86% figure.
ePlus vs xPlus — why the distinction matters
It is worth being precise about which Sunamp product belongs in this system, because the two main Thermino variants work in fundamentally different ways and are not interchangeable for this application.
The ePlus has one further important characteristic for this application: it is future-proofed. Adding the Optimino ePV key at any point enables solar PV diversion as an additional charging source alongside or instead of the Eddi. A home that starts with an Eddi driving the ePlus from curtailed wind can later add solar panels and have both sources charging the same unit, maximising self-consumption across the whole year — solar in summer, curtailed wind in winter, cheap off-peak electricity as backup.
The dual-channel cascade — how it works in a real home
The system design follows a straightforward sequential priority. When curtailed Scottish wind creates surplus electricity on the local distribution network, the Eddi's CT clamp detects it and begins diverting in order of priority.
WIND
SOURCE
CHANNEL 1
PRIORITY
CHANNEL 2
SECONDARY
STAGE
OUTCOME
How it works differently for gas combis, system boilers, and heat pumps
Gas combi boiler homes — the majority of Scottish homes
Combi boilers have no hot water cylinder — they heat water on demand directly from the mains. This makes them incompatible with standard Eddi installations that target an immersion heater. The Sunamp ePlus on Eddi Channel 2 solves this elegantly: it effectively creates the storage the combi has never had, while simultaneously acting as a pre-heater. Cold mains water passes through the ePlus before the combi sees it. On a high-curtailment day, the ePlus is charged to 58°C and the water entering the combi may be at 45–50°C already — leaving the combi only a few degrees of work to do for DHW. The research result of 86% carbon reduction applies directly to this configuration.
For a typical Scottish gas combi home, the Eddi alone has limited value (no cylinder to charge). But an Eddi paired with a Sunamp ePlus transforms the combi home into a renewable-ready system: curtailed wind charges the ePlus, the ePlus pre-heats the combi's water, and the gas consumption for domestic hot water approaches zero on windy days. No cylinder installation required. No system redesign. The ePlus fits where the cylinder never was.
System boiler homes with hot water cylinders
These homes have both a cylinder (Eddi Channel 1) and a boiler that heats the cylinder via a coil. The ePlus on Channel 2 adds a second layer: once the cylinder is fully charged by wind via Channel 1, the ePlus begins charging too. The result is a system where both hot water stores are full of free wind energy. The system boiler's role in DHW is almost entirely displaced on high-curtailment days, and gas consumption shifts primarily to space heating alone.
Heat pump homes
Heat pumps present the most technically significant efficiency gain from the ePlus configuration. A heat pump periodically switches from space heating to DHW heating — a high-temperature cycle that requires the heat pump to work at lower COP and often includes an immersion top-up to reach 60°C for Legionella. If the ePlus on Channel 2 provides pre-heated water before the heat pump's DHW circuit, the temperature rise required of the heat pump is dramatically reduced. On days when the ePlus is fully charged and can supply water at 55°C+, the heat pump's DHW immersion may not need to fire at all. The heat pump returns to space heating — the mode where it achieves its best seasonal COP — faster and more often.
The Tepeo ZEB — 40 kWh of space heating that charges itself from wasted wind
Everything so far has addressed domestic hot water. The Eddi on Channel 1 fills the cylinder. The Sunamp ePlus on Channel 2 pre-heats the water entering the boiler. But space heating — the larger of the two energy demands in most Scottish homes — has been handled by the gas boiler in our model throughout. That changes with the Tepeo ZEB.
Tepeo is a British clean-tech company founded in 2018 and manufactured in Wokingham, Berkshire. Its product — the Zero Emission Boiler, or ZEB — is exactly what its name suggests: a plug-and-play replacement for a fossil fuel boiler in a wet central heating system. It does not burn gas. It charges from electricity, stores heat in a high-density thermal core, and releases it on demand to the existing radiators or underfloor heating. From the household's perspective, the heating works identically to before. From the grid's perspective, it is a 40 kWh smart thermal battery that can be pointed directly at curtailment events.
Charge rate: Up to 9.3 kW from the mains — fully charged in approximately 4–5 hours
Smart charging: Built-in algorithm using weather forecasts, heating habits, tariff rates, grid carbon intensity · Octopus Agile/Go compatible · app controlled
Grid response: Charges natively during off-peak / low-carbon periods — automatically aligns with curtailment events when connected to dynamic tariffs
Space heating: Delivers heat to existing radiators or underfloor heating on demand — no system changes needed
DHW: NOT a combi — requires a separate hot water cylinder (where Eddi Ch1 comes in) or Sunamp ePlus
Dimensions: 598 × 660 × 980mm · floor standing · similar footprint to a boiler
Suitable homes: 3,000–12,000 kWh annual heat demand (typically 2–3 bed) · requires wet heating system
Cost: £6,000 including VAT and delivery · typical install 1–2 days · £2,500 BUS grant from winter 2026
Guarantee: 10 years as standard
// Source: tepeo.com · OVO Energy ZEB guide · Installer Online interview with Johan du Plessis, CEO
Why the ZEB is already a wasted wind device — without needing an Eddi
The critical insight about the ZEB is that it does not require an Eddi to respond to curtailed wind. It does this natively. The ZEB's smart charging algorithm connects to time-of-use electricity tariffs — most importantly Octopus Agile, which prices electricity at half-hourly wholesale market rates. During curtailment events in Scotland, wholesale prices on Agile frequently fall to near zero or even go negative. The ZEB detects these prices, recognises them as the optimal charging window, and charges its 40 kWh thermal core at the cheapest, greenest, most wind-heavy moments on the grid — automatically, without any additional hardware.
This is the wasted wind absorption mechanism working as designed, at the consumer level. The ZEB is in effect a domestic-scale version of what grid operators are trying to achieve through Constraint Cost Programme and demand-side flexibility mechanisms — but it does it through market signals rather than direct grid instructions, requiring no new regulatory framework to function today.
The comparison with an electric boiler is important and worth making explicitly. An ordinary electric boiler uses electricity at the moment of demand — peak rate, peak carbon, peak cost. At 27p/kWh that makes it roughly four times more expensive to run than a gas boiler. The ZEB charges at off-peak rates — on Octopus tariffs, 7.5–9.5p/kWh — making its running costs comparable to a heat pump and dramatically cheaper than an electric boiler. The storage is the entire proposition. A ZEB on a Scottish home, charged during curtailment events when Agile prices approach zero, is effectively free to run on windy days. The gas bill does not just fall — it disappears.
The ZEB + Eddi + Sunamp system — the complete thermal cascade
When the ZEB is added to our existing Eddi and Sunamp system, the three products cover all of a home's thermal needs from curtailed wind electricity:
WIND
PRIORITY
SECONDARY
SMART
CHARGE
OUTCOME
Proven, practical, scalable — and excluded from every government scheme
The most striking element of the Edinburgh Napier research is not the 86% figure. It is what the paper says about why this technology is not already in millions of homes. The researchers identified a comprehensive set of policy failures that together constitute a systemic exclusion of a proven low-carbon technology from the retrofit support ecosystem.
The policy exclusion is not just a problem for Sunamp. It is a problem for the wasted wind argument too. If Sunamp ePlus units were eligible for ECO4, a significant proportion of the 816,764 Scottish homes we are targeting could receive them at zero or low cost to the household. The constraint cost savings to the grid — currently £1.5 billion a year and rising toward £8 billion — would more than fund a national deployment programme. Instead, the government is paying to waste wind, while simultaneously refusing to fund the technology that would absorb it.
Scotland's three-product thermal fleet — the complete numbers
| Metric | Ch1 only | Ch1 + Ch2 + Sunamp | + ZEB (full system) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thermal storage per home | 12.1 kWh | 22.1 kWh | 62.1 kWh |
| Fleet thermal storage | 9.9 GWh | 18.1 GWh | 50.7 GWh |
| Annual absorption capacity | ~3.6 TWh | ~6.6 TWh | ~18.5 TWh |
| Scotland 2025 curtailed wind | ~5–7 TWh — annual fleet capacity is 3× the problem | ||
| DHW carbon reduction | Partial | Up to 86% | Up to 86% |
| Space heating carbon reduction | None | None | 100% — gas boiler retired |
| Eddi (816,764 × £850) | ~£694m | ~£694m | ~£694m |
| Sunamp Thermino 210 ePlus | — | ~£2.04bn | ~£2.04bn |
| Tepeo ZEB (× £6,000, –£2,500 BUS) | — | — | ~£2.86bn net after BUS grants |
| Total system cost | ~£694m | ~£2.74bn | ~£5.6bn (£3.6bn net after BUS) |
| Comparison | EGL1+EGL2: £6.8bn · transmission only · no storage · 2029 · Payback on full system: under 2 years at 2030 constraint trajectory | ||
The payback calculation deserves emphasis. The UK spent £1.5 billion in 2025 on constraint costs. Installing 816,764 dual-channel Eddi and Sunamp systems costs approximately £2.74 billion in total hardware. At current constraint cost trajectories — rising toward £8 billion annually by 2030 — the entire fleet cost is recovered in absorbed constraint savings within two years of deployment. Every year after that, the system is generating net returns to the grid while simultaneously cutting household carbon emissions by up to 86% for domestic hot water.
The research is in. Edinburgh Napier University, Worcester Bosch and Sunamp have demonstrated in a real home, with calibrated telemetry, that a Sunamp Thermino ePlus used as a pre-heater for a gas boiler delivers up to 86% carbon reduction in domestic hot water heating during periods of renewable generation. The technology is commercially available, Eddi-compatible, and costs approximately £2,500 installed.
The product is right. The Thermino ePlus has a built-in 2,800W immersion element that the Eddi drives on Channel 2 exactly as it drives a conventional immersion heater on Channel 1. No custom engineering. No non-standard plumbing. No compatibility risk. The system is designed to work together — Sunamp even lists the Eddi specifically as a compatible diverter.
The policy is wrong. The Sunamp ePlus is excluded from SAP, from the Home Energy Model, from ECO4, and from the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund. The technology that could cut DHW carbon by 86%, absorb 94–100% of Scotland's annual curtailed wind as useful heat, and pay back its installation cost in under two years from grid constraint savings — cannot access a single pound of UK government retrofit funding. The UK is paying £1.5 billion a year to waste wind while simultaneously refusing to fund the technology that would absorb it. These are not two separate failures. They are the same failure viewed from opposite ends.